<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>How the Washington Post is Ruining its Brand Online</title>
		<description>Discuss How the Washington Post is Ruining its Brand Online</description>
		<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.alledia.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/614/10/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>yarismak says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-8522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, great find of bad practice!!! It is shocking that such a newspaper has got this so wrong. As Cory mentioned, it is difficult to know what should and what not be edited out, but its clear that the examples you've shown should be deleted.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yarismak</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-8522</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>presretac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-8019</link>
			<description><![CDATA[nice post, and my post is not to short]]></description>
			<dc:creator>presretac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-8019</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve Burge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6606</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the Washington Post has just become the new Yahoo Answers. Free links from a site as reputable as the Post's ...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve Burge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6606</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve Burge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Absolutely. I think the simple answer is that they have no moderation at all. Compare that to Guardian.co.uk or NYTimes.com (often cited as the two best online newspapers) and you'll often see "Deleted by moderator", plus a "report this comment" button.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve Burge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6603</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Towers says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6597</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, great find of bad practice!!! It is shocking that such a newspaper has got this so wrong. As Cory mentioned, it is difficult to know what should and what should not be edited out, but its clear that the examples you've shown should be deleted.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Towers</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 09:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6597</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve Burge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6595</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A very good point Bernard Nowhere on the Post's site is there a clear comments policy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve Burge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 09:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6595</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bernard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6594</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems to me you should just have a clear comments policy, and if it is stated as allowing freedom of speech, but excluding spam or abusive comments, that should be fine. If one of your comments is then deleted by a moderator, you can lodge a complaint with the editors.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 09:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6594</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cory Webb says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6593</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great! Looking forward to it...sorry for hijacking the comments to discuss the Chicago stuff... Back on topic... I agree that the Post is the arbiter, but where do you draw the line? There are clear violations like some of the examples you posted above, but then there are not-so-clear violations. Also, what happens if you have a politically biased editor who deletes all comments critical of his or her candidate of choice because he or she deems them "inappropriate"?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cory Webb</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6593</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve Burge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6592</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey Cory - I would say that the Post is. We get a lot of those kinds of comments posted here but we don't publish them. Its a business and they have standards to keep up. Working on the Chicago stuff now ... It was a really big success! I've a whole bunch of stuff to post over the coming week from Powerpoints, handouts, Expo recaps and news of big Joomla projects.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve Burge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6592</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cory Webb says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6591</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems like it would be a tough balancing act for a site like Washington Post. The real debate would be over where you draw the line between protecting your brand and censorship. Who is the arbiter of what is appropriate and what is inappropriate? On a different note...I'm surprised I haven't read a re-cap of how this weekend's event in Chicago went. Can we expect a blog post soon? ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cory Webb</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/business/how-the-washington-post-is-ruining-its-brand-online/#comment-6591</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

