<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Joomla URL Week Part 3 - Artio SEF Review</title>
		<description>Discuss Joomla URL Week Part 3 - Artio SEF Review</description>
		<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.alledia.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/187/10/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>spam-free JoomSEF available</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5649</link>
			<description><![CDATA[URL caching in the latest version is great. Also has fixed dupe link issues, now it's almost as good as sh404SEF. You can get a spam-free JoomSEF from kangainternet.com/downloads.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Joly</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 05:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5649</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Version 2.2.1 fixes a lot of ills, including duplicate URLs</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5598</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You should definitely get the latest 2.2.1 version if you're using 1.5x.. it is MUCH better. Fixed the duplicate URL issues and several others for us. Still not perfect, but a lot closer.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>mantis108</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5598</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Joomla SEF URL's</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5389</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have been using Artio JoomSEF for a couple of months and is a happy user - but a bit dissapointed of all the duplicate URL's generated. There should be a automatic block function for this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Trond</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5389</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Excellent component</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5234</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That's not true, the only spam which is found in this component is the free version. The commercial version which is less than the cost of a Sunday dinner, completely spam/advert free and great for any commercial website. I find it a little strange how people charge money to produce a website but then will complain if they have to pay for the bits to make it!! So does that mean the component developer should work for free to allow you to charge your client money. Pay for the component and help the component developer excellent work. I think this mentality should be discouraged Great work Steve for the review and Artio for a fine component.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ian Wright</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5234</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Brian Teeman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5077</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The inclusion of spam metadata in this extension makes it a complete no no for me. Whilst it is true that I can hack the extension to remove them each time a new version is released (ie every month) I will need to hack this again, and again and again. This sort of spam should be discouraged]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Brian Teeman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5077</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve Burge says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5075</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Zorro You really picked up on what I also feel are the key points. I don't want to give too much away before publishing the conclusions I reached after doing this study, but this problem is central and I'll talk about some potential solutions. This leads to one of potential solutions :-) More on Friday...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve Burge</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5075</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Klaus Nitsche says:</title>
			<link>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5074</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That's true, but it's not the SEF extensions' fault: With Joomla's architecture it is the component developers who need to supply an interface via the sef_ext.php file so that the SEF extensions can use it. I take that to read "there is very limited compatibility with sef_ext.php files that were made for OpenSEF and SEF Advance". I noticed this myself when taking Artio for a quick test run: It didn't utilize AlphaContent's sef_ext file correctly and so it was gone from my server quickly. Also, the spammy links and the queries issue don't make Artio a viable choice for me. Now if only OpenSEF were a multi-person project so it could advance more quickly. ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Klaus Nitsche</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-urls/joomla-url-week-part-3-artio-sef-review/#comment-5074</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

