Home / SEO / Results of the Alledia.com Migration 
SEO
Apr
10
2009
Results of the Alledia.com Migration
Written by Steve Burge   
Avatar

At the beginning of March 2009, we migrated this website from Joomla 1.0 to 1.5.

We discussed some of the technical issues involved in this blog post, and I'm now going to talk about the Search Engine Optimization angle. I've had quite a bit of experience in moving sites to new platforms and my experience is that the traffic drop can vary from 0% to 75% depending how well its done. For example, the only other Joomla person to publish their data was Barrie from Compassdesigns.net who reported a 20% drop in traffic after his move to 1.5.

Hypothesis

Based on experience, this is what I expect the ballpark figures to be for different kinds of migration.

  1. Kept the same URLs: 0% to 10% drop in traffic
  2. 301 redirects from old URLs to new: Around a 25% drop in traffic.
  3. Broken URLs with no redirects: A 50% or greater drop in traffic

Why do URLs matter so much? I often try to explain it this way .... imagine if you had a coffee shop with a steady stream of customers. One day you shut your doors and moved to the other side of town. Imagine how many of them would bother to travel the extra 20 minutes to visit you. Now imagine that you didn't even put a note on the door telling them where you'd gone.

In Barrie's 20% example, he had a mix of #1, #2 and #3, so 20% was a reasonable drop to expect. He was using Search Engine Friendly URLs and both his 1.0 and 1.5 which is essential to guarantee the smoothest possible migration.

Actual Experience With Alledia.com

Since we launched this site in October 2006, our traffic growth has been very steady:

Long Term Growth

Let's compare the last two week period before the migration to the first two week period afterwards:

  • Green: before the move
  • Blue: after the move

Migration Comparison

We can see a small traffic drop, but let's get some more specific data. Unique visitors are down 7.82%, but those that do come are staying longer and reading 6.52% more pages.

Migration Stats

Analyzing the Results

At just under 8%, we were towards the lower end of the 0% to 10% range.

What went right?

  • URLs. We used Search Engine Friendly URLs which made it very easy to recreate mostly the same structure in Joomla 1.5
  • Data. Using Google Analytics we made a list of my top 100 traffic pages and ensured they worked on 1.5

What went wrong?

  • Punctuation. We included too much puncutation in our URLs on 1.0. That produced some old URLs that weren't replicable on Joomla 1.5 (one example)
  • Lack of time. Although we checked our top 100 traffic pages, we simply ran out of time to do more. That meant there were a lot of pages where we could only trust that the links worked. We had quite of lot of broken links reported for our less-visited pages. I suspect that is where our 8% of traffic went. If we'd had time to check every page, the number would have been much closer to 0%.
For SEO Club members, we've just completed a new chapter that deals exclusively with migrations.

Over To You ...

Do you have experience of migrating a site to Joomla or from Joomla 1.0 to 1.5? Did you traffic drop and if so, by how much? Do you have any tips and tricks for migrations?

?

 

Comments  

 
#1 Cory Webb 2009-04-10 11:38
Thanks for sharing, Steve. I had similar experiences when I migrated HowToJoomla.net (www.howtojoomla.net) from 1.0 to 1.5. The main thing, which you mentioned, is making sure your URL's carry over, so you don't lose traffic due to broken URL's.

I did a complete redesign of HowToJoomla and added JomSocial to the site. Overall, I would say that traffic has grown pretty significantly and at a higher rate since I took those steps. If I had just done a straight migration, I don't think I would have lost any traffic in the long run.
Quote
 
 
#2 Steve Burge 2009-04-10 18:45
Thanks Cory - that is another aspect of migrating that is harder to pinpoint in a % figure ... what is the long-term effect of the extra features you're able to add during a migration.
Quote
 
 
#3 Cory Webb 2009-04-10 21:50
Yeah, it's difficult to tell if the migration had any effect in and of itself. You hit on a good point, though. I would not have been able to install JomSocial in 1.0, although I'm not sure how much use it's getting.

Another good thing about the move to 1.5 is that I have complete control over the header tags, so titles are given their proper hierarchy on the page unlike in 1.0. Not sure how much that affects traffic, but the markup is a lot cleaner.
Quote
 
 
#4 Brian Teeman 2009-04-11 06:53
I took a different approach brian.teeman.net/web-development/does-joomla-migration-hurt-seo.html to migrating urls etc. And put my faith in the improved site structure and new content areas.
Quote
 
 
#5 Sean Cook 2009-04-14 21:07
Thanks Steve for this post! Also, thanks Cory for your comments! I have been thinking of migrating now that I have been developing sites now in 1.5x and like it much better than 1.0x. I was also debating of restructuring and moving the music store to a subdomain, but this could kill its rankings, so I am still debating this. However, I appreciate the post and others I have read on this subject.
Quote
 
 
#6 SavvyAndrea 2009-04-15 07:53
Hi Steve. Great info. We recently switched over to Joomla. I've been reading up on SEO and my goal is to optimize our site the best we can. Do you consult and/or take on projects? My website is www.NaturallySavvy.com - would love to chat as you were recommended to me on Twitter (@naturallysavv y). Let me know. Thanks.
Quote
 
 
#7 nicholas h 2009-04-18 16:59
for the urls that you did not translate cause you did not have time, what happens to them? Do they go to the 404 page? Any chance if the url is broken then you get an email if some clicks on it and you add a 301 redirect in your .htaccess file?
Quote
 
 
#8 ruigato 2009-07-09 12:22
Im having the same dilema right now.
Have a 4 year old site, manage to migrate from mambo to j! 1.0 than to J! 1.5 and keep the same url structure, thanks to Sef_advance.
Now that the migration is done i am having problems with modules, components. All works with default J! sef and the new router.php but the urls are diferent than the old ones..

dont know if i discard Sef Advance and loose long tail traffic and have a future proof solution or if i should keep it as is and try to solve the problems..

what do you experts think?
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh