Welcome to Alledia, the #1 Joomla Training Company

Would you like to learn Joomla? We're here to help you: Sign Up Today

  • Professionally-produced training videos and tutorials.
  • Guaranteed same-day answers to all your Joomla questions.
  • No Joomla experience needed. We've taught 1000s of Joomla students.

Home / Product Reviews / Review of Jomsocial 
Feb
02
2009

Review of Jomsocial

Written by Steve Burge   
Avatar

This is a sponsored review of the Jomsocial extension. For details of having your extension reviewed, please contact us. Note that a sponsored review doesn't mean I'll like the product, just that I'll take the time to review it thoroughly.


Jomsocial For several years there has really one been one social networking option for Joomla ... Community Builder. Some people love it, others hate it, but it was impossible to ignore. We use it here on alledia.com because three years ago it was really the only option for expanded user profiles and networking.

Two months ago Azrul, the developer of Jomcomment and MyBlog, released an alternative social networking solution called Jomsocial. Is it any good?

Jomsocial Pros

  • Easy to use. We're running Jomsocial on a site aimed at non-techincal people. Almost all of them have found it easy to upload an image and edit their profile. I couldn't always say the same about Community Builder.
  • In-built features. To allow people to create their own groups, upload photos and send private messages. Community Builder needed extra plugins. Groups were handled by the consistently buggy Groupjive and there were a few photo solutions, none as tightly integrated as Jomsocial.
  • Design. Sorry CB, but Jomsocial looks better. It ships with two good templates and the navigation is very intuitive.
  • Integrations. The key factor with many extensions is whether they can convince other developers to make their work compatible. Jomsocial is off to a great start. I've found integrations with Eventlist, jReviews, Fireboard, Seyret, Mosets Tree and of course, Jomcomment and MyBlog.
  • People like it. Simple as that. From talking to other Joomla developers and then seeing the number of posts on their forums and blog, people like Jomsocial. That gives it a good chance of being around for a long time.

Jomsocial Cons

The main drawback is that its not cheap. At $149 its one of the more expensive extensions on the market. Its also not GPL so you'll need one license per site. There are also some current limitations caused by the fact that its only two months old. These cons exist, although I expect them to be solved in future versions:

  • No forum integration yet (except a beta called "ccBoard") phpBB3 and Kunena (the new fork of Fireboard) are planned, but not yet ready.
  • No registration expansion. You can't use Jomsocial to collect more information when people register, only after.
  • Limited profile customization. Currently the site adminsitrator defines user profile fields. There's no option for individual users or groups to customize their profiles.

The Verdict on Jomsocial

I like it and I'll use it. We've implemented it already on two big sites, including one that I'll reveal tomorrow. It's not right for every site, but here's where I see it fitting in:

  • Lower budget sites: Community Builder still works smoothly and of course, its free.
  • More advanced sites: If you need a social networking setup that feels familar to people raised on Facebook and Twitter, Jomsocial is a good solution at a reasonable price.
  • Enterprise site: Kickapps or Userplane will remain the options for very high-end sites with large budgets.

Over to You ...

I know a lot of have already tried Jomsocial. What do you think ... ?

Free Weekly Joomla Tutorials

Your Comments (39)

0
erdem
February 02, 2009

hi
i think jomsocial is great
but the search module is the weakest part of the
of the component ..
i need to know the modify it yo advance search..
just like your search modul for instnce
appreciate if you tell me

thanks in advance

0
Wender
February 03, 2009

I didn?t tried Jomsocial yet, but i highly recommed Joomunity, http://my.joomunity.org/ its a 100% free alternative, Joomunity was available before joomsocial ;)

Cheers

0
Developer123
February 04, 2009

I doubt that JomSocial will be able to suit the big community, it uses lots of MySQL queries per page and the server will be blown.

0
stopitwender
February 04, 2009

Can we stop recommending Joomunity until it's no longer vaporware? This is getting a little screwed up.

steve_hannisdalexpress
Stephen Moseley
February 04, 2009

Steve,

We'll be launching a site soon that uses JomSocial, so I thought I'd give my perspective.

First - it is quantum leaps above CB. Sorry - I know a lot of people love CB, but if you need to style a community component, CB is a nightmare. JomSocial is coded and setup in a very organized MVC way, so the template files are really easy to change. CB was horrible to try and change, with html mixed in with data-related code. Props to Azrul for making a very well coded component.

I have two gripes. 1) Developers seem to be slow fixing some of the bugs. Look, I know they are busy but there were some pretty significant bugs that were outstanding between releases 1.0.127 and 1.0.128. There are still a couple of very noticable bugs that haven't been fixed. If you look around in the forums, you'll definitely notice people asking about them. Overall 1.0.128 is much better though...

2) Flexibility. This is something were I miss CB. The registration system is a HUGE fail for me. Not very flexible at all. Also, if you don't want a feature like Karma or Friends, there isn't a way to turn them off - you have to delete them from the template. Now, that is easy enough, but it would be nice if there was a toggle in the backend to determine which features you want. I know this makes the code much more "dynamic" and more difficult in some situations, but not everyone wants friending capabilities or a Karma system on their site.

Overall JomSocial is magnitudes better than CB - but I hope they shore up some of the deficiencies in the current component before they add a bunch more "flashy" features.

bobthebob01
julien b
February 17, 2009

interesting article.

I agree with the part on template issue with CB. It was such a nightmare that i gave up the first time and took me a while to come back to it. And yes, definitely still buggy.

On the other hand, not that it is a bad thing, but when i browse the JS site it feels a lot like i'm on facebook. When it came out i was hopping that some one some how had an epiphany and came up with something ground breaking.

Yes it is for the joomla! component world, but no it is definitely not for the online social network world.

i'd be curious to know how many site are running JS? anybody knows?

0
Beth
February 18, 2009

Glad to see this review! We've been checking out JomSocial for while now. Kind of hard to really put it through its paces on a demo, but as compared to CB, which we use frequently, JomSocial is on a whole new level.

I think one of the key phrases in the review is "feels familiar to people raised on Facebook and Twitter". When you're trying to appeal to that market, you do what 'cha gotta do!

Thanks for the info!
Beth

bobthebob01
julien b
February 18, 2009

Agree with you Beth on one point: since it's resembling so much to Facebook, it makes people feel very comfortable with it right away; which is good i guess.

steve_hannisdalexpress
Stephen Moseley
February 18, 2009

jjjjjjj and Beth,

I agree about the whole "it resembles Facebook" thing. This to me wasn't really a selling point - in fact it is a bit of a detriment. It all depends on what Azrul wants to do with the component, but it seems like they are trying to turn it into a Joomla version of NING or some other "create your own" social network things.

I guess I don't see the point of that. At some level, you will then be competing with Facebook groups that have a similar area of scope. I guess I'm confused why you would make a system that looks really nice, but then have the infrastructure setup to be going against the likes of Facebook in a way. People only want to be apart of a few things (social media mavens aside) so why compete with something like Facebook that so many people are a part of. Why not really dig into facebook connect and try to leverage the power of that with a Joomla component - that is at least what I wish they had done.

Don't get me wrong - it is magnitudes better than CB in some areas. I just hope they add some flexibility to the component so that some of the features can be removed. We had to change almost all the templates because there were several features that didn't make any sense for the community we were creating.

0
Simon Wells
February 19, 2009

Is Jom Social right for me?

We have a product based site and are interested to have a user login area, where users can discuss products, projects, meet new clients and manufacturers as well as allow product articles to be written for admin review before submission.
We hope to have a couple of hundred users eventually, would this be suitable.

Perhaps we would be better off having a custom module coded for us, not too sure, any suggestions?

0
michaelp
March 04, 2009

Hi, I have jomsocial and I like it very much. As far as it looking like face book i think that is all the better since it is a familiar feel. infact I'm going to integrate a facebook log in with the possibility to invite your friends from face book and when they sign in it will pull all their face profile information. I do want to have to compete with the likes of face book. Wouldn't that be great???

If someone wants to build a social networking site especially if it's for a specific niche I just can't see how you can go wrong. I don't even know how to code but have customized my site getting advice from the authors as well as other users.

When it comes to CB I think it really sucks. Yes it been around for a few years now and there are a lot of plug ins but for one it is flat out ugly. CB is not appealing at all, I mean it just does not look like it was even developed this decade. I gave up on trying to make it look like a new web 2.0 site.

jomsocial is missing a few functions that I would like to see but they are coming from the developers and 3rd party developers. I purchased JS in Dec 08 ver 1.1.27 and it has been upgraded 4 times since then so they are actively developing JS.

Simon, Not sure if this would work for you. If you want send me I'll send you a demo log in and you can test drive a site I am build.

Michael

0
D
March 30, 2009

JomSocial API is documented - but the functions aren't presented in the code and support forums keep silence. This sucks..

0
BigWillie
March 31, 2009

I am using JomSocial on my family site and I must say thumbs up !! Much better than CB.

0
FullMedia
April 18, 2009

Having tried to implement the same site under both Community Builder, and now JomSocial I believe that, while still 'young', JomSocial is a superior platform to CB already. For me the clincher was trying to implement a usable "groups" structure under CB and then under JomSocial ... there simply is no comparison ... JomSocial wins by an incredibly wide margin.

I admit that I hated having to cough up $100 for JomSocial, but with new commercial integrations coming online for CB, if you tally it up, just adding an activity stream to CB will cost you about as much - 39 euros times 2 = $101 dollars! ... in this context the cost for JomSocial isn't really bad ...

0
Sean Comar
April 26, 2009

SimonWells and michaelp: Our focus is also to build Social Network Site for a niche business area. This write up has been extremely useful as I started evaluating CB and JS only one month back. michaelp>> pl email me your site info; thanks. Simon>> What has been your decision?

0
Anonymous
May 12, 2009

Joomla is suppose to be free! Whats this bollocks of paying for extensions now!!

0
dom
May 20, 2009

Does JomSocial have its own User interface? Can you search users by say state or other custom fields?

0
Eric Lynch
June 01, 2009

Hello,

We just installed Jomsocial 1.2 (video etc.). Does anyone know if they have an auto send with admin, that shoots a "Welcome" email out to new members? Of you what's it listed under?

0
Neal G
June 03, 2009

I purchased the trial last month and installed it and while the initial install went OK, the post install configuration was another story altogether, I wen searching through the docs etc... and what I found was incredibly lacking to say the least. And to add insult to injury I learn that the price is not $149 as advertised but $161 and some small change.
After discussions with others who have attempted to use this and discovering that they had the same negative experiences that I had with this product. I cannot in good faith recommend this to anyone.
This morning I learned that I was charged for this worthless product (I thought that I had a couple of more days to cancel the subscription), needless to say I fired off a couple of emails and made a phone call to follow up on this matter and request an immediate refund. These people should really be ashamed of themselves for charging what they charge for this and haveing substandard documentation and support!

0
Neal G
June 03, 2009

Anyhow, I tried out ocPortal and have been having much better success out of the box, the only downside is that now I have to learn a new system.

0
Anonymouse
July 03, 2009

The product itself is ok. They have consistently added new features. However, new bugs are also introduced. There is no roadmap. Features seem to be added based on "what do we feel like coding today?" Originally they referred all feature requests to UserVoice, which they then disregarded and did whatever they felt like. They consistently avoid tough questions on the forum (although simple problems are usually handled very quick, and they do offer to set many things up for you). The license agreement looks like it was written by a child, and it isn't included in the package. They update the license on the site, but don't publish the changes, and since it's not included in the package you have no idea what license applies to which version. I like the software, but Azrul and his team (excepting the guys that are always on the forum helping out) need to look up the work "professional", as their operation is anything but.

0
halbertech
August 17, 2009

Other than being stodgy looking out of the box CB is a fantastic component with many years of development. JomSocial will probably get there but good job given it's infancy. People need to keep in mind that community building means different things to different people. Ironically, the number 1 feature request on the JomSocial site is paid subscription. CB's got that with cbsubs and it couldn't be easier. So is JomSocial prettier absolutely...better featured...debatable. My own view is that given the cost of that component (JomSocial)it certainly shouldn't require the kind of elbow grease expressed by many on this comment blog.

0
Alwin
August 20, 2009

I have used the Jomsocial with the Jomtube and the myBlog. It is a very good extension and the code is easy to understand and hack. Also it alreasdy has got a number of plugins for integrating the thirdparty components. Here you can find a comparison of the various social networking extensions.Visit http://hacking-joomla.blogspot.com

OFL
penn wooding
September 26, 2009

Jomsocial is a fantastic addition to any community website with a large membership. I have mine installed on a fish keeping website so many of my members use various social networking websites already so they feel right at home and know how to use it.

0
curious
September 29, 2009

Has anyone tried the version1.5? any comments?

0
InsaneInTheMembrane
October 05, 2009

JomSocial's latest crapola is 1.5 and its so buggy. Once they released it outta BETA (mind you that the beta users were ignored as alot of the bugs reported and ones from 1.2 were still in the release) they had to release another build. This is also buggy.

Support is horrible. The devs ignore the support staff as mentioned by a few support volunteers.

Don't waste your money. You will be forever frustrated. Besides, you should never use a BETA product (JomSocial is NOT STABLE nor true Joomla 1.5 compliant) on your production sites.

Azrul is infamous for SH*TTY support.

There are others on the way out but you could try Dolphin if you really want a decent community site.

0
miamiman
October 21, 2009

There are so many issues I am trying to get my head around when it comes to social sites.

1. If our social sites are mini-replicas of Facebook, shouldn't we just raise the white-flag and concentrate our efforts on Facebook Group or Fan Pages, rather than re-invent the wheel?

2. What's the advantage of using CB or JomSocial, if there are other third-party apps that you pay a monthly fee that may ultimately be more robust? Maybe Kickapps or Ning is a better alternative than installing yet another extension - whether GNL or not.

Re: CB, we've been using it for over a year, and yes, I agree that it is stodgy. Certainly, it doesn't lend itself to being considered a Social Site component as per Facebook. But maybe that's a positive point?

0
bob2
October 22, 2009

Yes, JS is very buggy. Even on the first stable release there were so many bugs and many things were overlooked. You could see that it was release to bring in some cash flow.

Simple settings as "not using the PM system" being set to no an still have the icon and text of PM everywhere on the front end. And that is just 1 stupid example out of plenty.

The support is really not good at all. We decided to use it for a client site and it created a lot of additional hacking for almost nothing.

It was promising at first when it came out but very disappointing product at the end.

Azrul should hire some additional dev to make it really stable and feature complete. This is especially frustrating when you pay over 100$ for it.

At this price tag, they must have made already a lot of money. So don't make us feel it is a "hit and run".

I'm not recommending it for a big production site. It's way too young for now.

0
MikeW
January 02, 2010

I moved from CB to JomSocial last night. While I love the look of JomSocial much more than CB, there were some things I simply had a hard time getting. It took me forever to get the idea that you must click the menu title "Profile" and not look on the sub menus to get to the place where you add content to your wall. Also, I am still having issues getting my profile pics to upload. I am sure I will get this resolved, though, since the JomSocial help is really, really good and very fast!

Finally ... The manual I received with CB was far superior to what is available with JomSocial. I prefer to use PDF manuals as opposed to the endless online links that many support areas are going to.

0
Coolex
February 04, 2010

Has anybody of you tried out anahitasocial: http://www.anahitapolis.de? I read many forum post that it will be much better than JomSocial. Does anybody has any information about it?

OFL
OFL
February 04, 2010

Anahitapolis looks quite good, however it seems it is not available to the general public yet. JomSocial 1.6 has been out for a few weeks now and it is very good, I upgraded from 1.5 extremely happy. I had a couple of issues with Internet Explorer error messages, however support from AZUL was very good and they put me right very quickly. I've been using JomSocial for quite a while now and I think it's going to be very difficult for someone to better it.

0
Coolex
February 05, 2010

Does anybody has negative experience with JomSocial 1.6?

OFL
OFL
February 05, 2010

Nope, no negative experiences at all with me. they have improved the layout over 1.5, not much, but is noticeably more aesthetically pleasing, if you look at the profile. The only problems I have had is occasionally a few plug-ins do render Internet Explorer page errors, and also sometimes stops the JavaScript running properly. I had one particular problem with the friends location map and the music on profile not working, it turned out to be the poke me plug-in that was the culprit. If all of a sudden you do make this a page error just backtrack and am publish any plug-ins or modules that you installed recently and nine times out of 10 the page arrow will disappear.

0
milind
February 15, 2010

its very nice component
i have used it now but i can't my site connect with facebook using thses component
how it possible means i have to import friends-id form his (user's) a/c how it possible pls help me?

0
milind
February 15, 2010

Thank OFL
i did all steps as told in above comment but i have to invite Facebook Friends On my joomla site and i used jomsocial component
pls give direction so i import my friend list into my site

OFL
OFL
February 15, 2010

I am not an expert on JomSocial, I went even using it myself for a few months. My understanding of the Facebook facility is that anyone with an account on Facebook can use their login details to access your website if you have JomSocial/Facebook activated. That personal details will automatically be inserted into the JomSocial profile and I believe it will be automatically updated when they update their Facebook account, I think, but I actually hold me to that

OFL
OFL
February 15, 2010

You should have a Facebook account, if you haven't then you will not be able to set this up. Check my website out and please feel free to access my site using your Facebook password and username to see how it works. Remember that is all you do, use your password and username
http://www.oscarfishlover.com/social-network

0
EOLGeorge
February 16, 2010

I've been using JS for about the last month and generally like it very much.

However there are some real issues with support and documentation.

Documentation is minimal at best. Its a fairly complex component and the existing materials barely scratch the surface.

Support is spotty and slow. For the most part they work bankers hours, 9 to 5 with weekends and holidays off. They are located in Malaysia and since I'm in the US there is a 12 hour time difference resulting in a minimum of a days delays in response to a question. If you ask on a Friday forget about an answer until Monday or Tuesday.

Then add in the fact that the primarily support through their forum, and they are selective about what they answer, AND the answers are often to "search the forums" it can get frustrating. FYI when you do search the forums the first pages of responses are often "search the forums"

If they put as much time into creating a comprehensive FAQ as replying search the forums it would save all a lot of time.

When you do get a response it is often very good, especially if you get a reply from Mark.

After all this I must say that it is a very good component, and hopefully worth the time I've spent customizing it it. If they just put some time into a Comprehensive FAQ (available only to paid subscribers) it could be great.

Write comment

 
  smaller | bigger
 

busy