Welcome to Alledia, the #1 Joomla Training Company

Would you like to learn Joomla? We're here to help you: Sign Up Today

  • Professionally-produced training videos and tutorials.
  • Guaranteed same-day answers to all your Joomla questions.
  • No Joomla experience needed. We've taught 1000s of Joomla students.

Home / Joomla SEO eBook / Do Search Engines Treat Joomla Sites Differently? 
Sep
26
2007

Do Search Engines Treat Joomla Sites Differently?

Written by Steve Burge   
Avatar Recently I've seen people talk about the idea that search engines profile websites partly on the script they use. This idea makes some sense to me because it is possible to make reasonable accurate generalisations about some CMS systems:


  • Wordpress = blogs, so they need to be updated regularly to rank well. Many great, high-quality blogs, but theres also a reasonable change that your average Wordpress installation is a splog, give the large number of people using automatic RSS importers.
  • Gallery2 = photos. Often little accompanying text, which doesn't make for great SEO material.
  • OSCommerce = shopping carts, so clearly a commercial site, and one that may be short on text and interesting articles.
  • Pligg = social news, often short snippets of articles from elsewhere. Little original content except comments.
  • Joomla = ..... ?

  • Do search engines treat your site any differently simply because its built with Joomla?


    No - I think that's FUD.


    Earlier this year we ran an SEO test comparing Drupal, Joomla and Wordpress head-to-head. In the end we saw no difference in results over 6 months, although Wordpress was substantially better at getting indexed more quickly. Wordpress is well setup for rapid indexing through its integration with major blog sites and its pinging capabilities, but these can be duplicated on Drupal and Joomla.


    Joomla sites should be able to avoid any negative pigeonholing by search engines simply because they aren't so diverse. Some are photo-heavy, some forum-heavy, some article-heavy and so on. I'm categorizing one Joomla site with others will be nearly as useful as grouping Gallery2, OSCommerce or Pligg sites together (to give just three examples).


    Finally, itf you're going to rely on recycled / duplicate / stolen content, there are much easier platforms to do it with than Joomla.


    Hummerbie summed it up very nicely when we posed this question on Monday:


    "I have been watching the figures since I removed the Joomla generator strings, but I can not give any conclusions to improved ranking because of this... ultimately it is the content that wins the battle."


    Free Weekly Joomla Tutorials

    Your Comments (1)

    
 <script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'>
 <!--
 var prefix = 'mailto:';
 var suffix = '';
 var attribs = '';
 var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
 var addy85283 = 'jason' + '@';
 addy85283 = addy85283 + 'openpotion' + '.' + 'com';
 document.write( '<a ' + path + '\'' + prefix + addy85283 + suffix + '\'' + attribs + '>' );
 document.write( addy85283 );
 document.write( '<\/a>' );
 //-->
 </script> <script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'>
 <!--
 document.write( '<span style=\'display: none;\'>' );
 //-->
 </script>This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 <script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'>
 <!--
 document.write( '</' );
 document.write( 'span>' );
 //-->
 </script>
    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
    March 03, 2010

    I would love to see google downrank cms's that are overly friendly to spammers. It would benefit the internet and that cms in the long run.

    Write comment

     
      smaller | bigger
     

    busy