| Written by Steve Burge |
 It is the news that the Joomla community has been waiting for since hints of a changed licensing stance first surfaced back in April: http://www.joomla.org/content/view/3510/1/ "We have decided to stay with the licence that made Joomla! possible. Unanimously supported by the core team and supported by the Open Source Matters board, this confirms that both Joomla! 1.0 and Joomla! 1.5 are released under the (pure) GPL. We've also decided that we do not have the authority to publish Joomla! under a version of the GPL that gives exceptions for proprietary extensions. " It is a brave move and one with very few precedents in the Open Source world. It will thus be a fascinating few months for Joomla, watched closely for lessons by people running hundreds of other FOSS projects. |
Comments
Another question comes to my mind. When I hire someone for custom development of a component I will be forced to release this component under the GPL. This way I have to pay for it and others can use it for free. This will certainly stop many people from hiring developers at all. Or do I see this wrong?
Why do there have to be such "earthquakes" in the Joomla community from time to time? This throws Joomla back every time. This way people will never trust OS software because You just cannot rely on the people behind it when there such moves from time to time...
It will be very interesting to see where this takes Joomla. What will happen with joomla.org when the dev team announces to make their site compliant? I guess the whole extension directory will disappear because it is based an "bad extensions". What about the huge amount of work that people have put into that? How will they feel? This is a punch in the face of so many.
Sometimes You just have to stick with a way You took in the beginning. It is honourable that the core team wants to correct mistake they made but sometimes it is just too late for that. Take it like it is and stick with your initial way!!
Just to clarify, you do not have to release a component that you hire someone to develop. It is only if you plan to distribute the component that you would have to release it under the GPL. If you are the only one using the component, there is nothing in the GPL that compels you to distribute it to anyone.
I agree with you, though, that this move by the core team is way too late. Too many people have built their livelihoods by developing commercial components to have it ripped out from under them like this. Yes, they could theoretically continue selling their extensions under a GPL license, but this move will have a drastic negative impact on these people if it is enforced.
Steve is right when he says it should be an interesting few months. I only hope we don't lose all of the talented commercial 3rd party developers over this.
What is even more unfortunate is that the statement whereby the core team believes it has no choice but to require all extensions to be GPL compliant does not provide full disclosure of the truth, IMHO. Apparently the Joomla team seems to have obtained its legal advice from the Free Software Foundation and have come to the conclusion that extensions (add-ons/plug-ins) to Joomla are "derivative works" under law and subject to the GPL license. This appears to be debatable at best, with the FSF obviously taking a most extreme position. At present, there is rarely a post in the Joomla forums where the team and moderators do not remind users regarding their understanding of the use of Joomla that they are not lawyers and that the users should seek legal advice to understand more.
So what is the moral of this story? Not caring to communicate with your community and developers can prove to be fatal to your efforts. The sadder part? There still is no communication to find a reasonable compromise and it appears that the core team does not believe that the incredibly talented group of extensions developers were significantly responsible for Joomla's growth.
Is Mambo following this kind of GPL hystery? I don't think so. Has anybody checked Elxis lately in this regard? Can anybody add things up and offer a prognosis where serious commercial development will happen in the future? Not around Joomla 1.5 for sure.
Too bad for what once looked like a great project and what became major league because of its extensions, many of them commercial.
http://www.joomla.org/announcements/team-news/3510-open-source-does-matter.html
RSS feed for comments to this post