Home / Drupal / Thoughts on Drupal and the White House Website 
Drupal
Oct
28
2009
Thoughts on Drupal and the White House Website
Written by Steve Burge   
Avatar

White House and DrupalSaturday was the biggest event for Open Source CMS systems since 2005.

Back in February 2005 we had the launch of Wordpress.com with super-easy installs and also Wordpress 1.5 with changeable themes. Later in the year, Joomla split from Mambo.

On Saturday, Drupal started powering Whitehouse.gov. It's such a big catch that it brings hugely increased credibility, not just for Drupal, but for our Open Source CMS industry in general. If you're not bidding for your next project by saying "this kind of software powers the White House website", you're crazy.

Big Thinking From Drupal Companies

I'll start off by saying that I only have public information to go on, but this is what I've been able to conclude:

It seems that this was the culmination of years of work by Drupal people in Washington D.C. and that they expressly targeted and studied how to get government contracts. The first ever large Drupal project was powering Howard Dean's website in the 2004 election campaign and they've been learning, networking and seeking government projects ever since. When the new Democratic administration arrived, all that effort began to pay off. Drupal was used for http://recovery.gov and http://www.nysenate.gov and Dries says more are coming "including the Department of Defense, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Education". Tim O'Reilly has a blog post on how big these guys are thinking and how professionally they're doing business:

" ... don't underestimate the difficulty of doing business in Washington. Procurement is done through a complex ballet understood by few open source companies ... a big IT deployment like this requires coordination between many companies, each providing a piece of the puzzle. According to techpresident.com, no fewer than five firms were involved in the switch: prime contractor General Dynamics Information Systems, Drupal specialists Phase 2 and Acquia, hosting provider Terremark, and CDN-supplier Akamai." link

General Dynamics is a huge government contractor that also executed the Bush-era White House CMS contract. Imagine the amount of networking needed and the number of projects you need to prove yourself on before they seriously consider your bids.

The Next Step?

Back in January 2007 I asked "can Joomla or Drupal Produce a RedHat?". Note this quote from Techpresident.com:

"Acquia according to Dries, "is to Drupal what Ubuntu or RedHat are to Linux.""

They've already raised at least $15 million in Venture Capital funding and those investors are probably feeling delighted this morning. With a project like this Drupal has comprehensively proven that its capable of high-level custom contracts. The White House project is a business card that is going to open a lot more boardroom doors.

One thing Drupal hasn't proven is the ability to appeal to the ordinary end-user. I wonder if that is the goal any longer ... how many ordinary end-users do you know working on Linux computers? Perhaps they're happy to leave the mass-market to Joomla and Wordpress and concentrate instead on such massive, high-margin projects.

 

Comments  

 
#1 Brian Teeman 2009-10-28 07:41
Seems like you're not the only blogger writing about this.

But Slate appears to have a very different view.

Why running the White House Web site on Drupal is a political disaster waiting to happen.


Definitely worth a read www.slate.com/id/2233719/
Quote
 
 
#2 Steve Burge 2009-10-28 07:49
I like the disclaimer on that article:

Quote:
Slate sister sites The Big Money, DoubleX, and The Root run on Drupal


More evidence of Drupal's penetration into the higher end of the market.
Quote
 
 
#3 Brian Teeman 2009-10-28 07:52 Quote
 
 
#4 HarryB 2009-10-28 09:11
Speaking from years of doing business with the US Government, I can say that the "...political disaster waiting to happen" is FUD at its worst. Substitute any proprietary or open source CMS for "Drupal" and one can reach the same conclusion.

And I suspect General Dynamics won the new contract because:

1. they were the incumbent
2. their technical proposal met the government's minimum requirements
3. and last but certainly not least, they were the low bidder and were presumed to offer the least technical and financial risk.

Bottom line is that US Government procurement is very risk averse and also seldom awards to anyone other than lowest bidder who meets their minimum requirements. That's typically what US Government's "Best Value" turns out to be.
Quote
 
 
#5 Amy Stephen 2009-10-28 12:29
I don't know, Steve, I think it would be a mistake to assume it's always going to be difficult to build a Drupal site. Even today, Open Atrium (openatrium.com/) is a very rich, easy to use Intranet install.

If you are looking for drop dead easy, can it get easier than Drupal Gardens (acquia.com/blog/drupal-gardens-pre-alpha-screencast)?

With the small core (developmentseed.org/blog/2009/oct/28/smallcore-manifesto-help-us-build-better-teddy-bear) discussions, the goal is to enable distributions in every color of the rainbow. Pop-it-in and go!

The Drupal community has hit full stride as collaborators. They have fabulous conflict, too, that is loud and opinionated and angry, but it resolves into stuff like the smallcore movement.

Hope to see us get there, too. I am convinced we have the talent. It's tough to figure out ways to collaborate and put food on the table. But that's how 3rd party developers will build voice and become a force to reckon with, not only as an empowered part of the project, but more importantly, a respected technical force in the world.
Quote
 
 
#6 Nikhil 2009-10-28 13:34
Cmon people you are getting too serious about this
how about this?
http://www.jforjoomla.com/view-post/ID152.html
Quote
 
 
#7 Steve Burge 2009-11-02 10:33
Nice one Amy - I think the smallcore movement is much needed in Drupal. There's just an overwhelming amount of options, menus and configurations for the beginner.

Drupal Gardens ... will be interesting to test when it launches.
Quote
 
 
#8 Joseph LeBlanc 2009-11-09 10:45
I'm late to the party here, but that's what I get for flying to the other side of the globe for a couple of weeks ;-)

I've worked in Federal contracting. The amount of 1999-era ColdFusion dreck still getting pushed around DC is unbelievable. Attitude and all, I'd far, far, far, far, far rather have government sites powered by Drupal than have to ever look at ColdFusion code ever again.

When ColdFusion isn't being pushed, it's some bloated "enterprise" CMS based in Java or ASP.net. Interestingly enough, "enterprise" seems to change to suit whatever the incumbent contractor needs it to mean.
Quote
 
 
#9 Bilal H. 2010-05-02 17:34
Looking at the page source of http://www.recovery.gov/, it seems that it is no longer using drupal. And judging by the inline css and javascript, they should never have changed :-).

---
Bilal
http://www.imprimante-info.com/
Quote
 
 
#10 Anna Gu 2010-07-08 07:19
Actually, I think that we can not say Joomla, Wordpress and Drupal, that which is overwhemingly beating the other. And getting government contracts really entails good skills and social network.
http://www.joomlaus.org
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh